The Portrait of Moralities In The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawtorne

Authors

  • Danul Aristiawan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70680/rcpdgk37

Keywords:

potrait of moralities, characters, novel

Abstract

The aimed of this research was to analyze and describe about the morality in Nathaniel Hawthorne work entitled The Portrait of morality in Scarlet Letter Novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Specially ,this research deal with (1) What are the potrait of moralities by the main characters Hester Prynne ,Arthur Dimmsdale and Roger Chilingworth drawn in Scarlet Letter Novel (2) What are the sequences of these moralities for the main character as the doer of the moralities in Scarlet Letter Novel. This research was descriptive qualitative research. The data were words, phrases, sentences from the first chapter until the last chapter. Theories used used in this research were concerned with novel as a literary work, morals and ethics,morality,morality and religion,morality and law,immorality and the structural approach in literary criticism.This research was catagorized as literary criticms,where the researcher doing analysis, interpretation and evaluation in conducting the research.The writer applies the structural approach in hisresearchbecause to analyzes what moralities characters and what is the consequences of these moralities for the character’s life based on the instrinsic element of this novel.The result of this research were stated as follow: (1)The moralities found in the Scarlet Letter Novel were adultery,hypocrisy and revenge (2)The three main characters get different consequences of thier morality and face the risk of the morality in different ways.Finally the author can conclude that no one is perfect even the priest which supposed tobe the right hand of God.This novel reveal the morality in details and the important point is how this novel is relevant for generation to generation as a guidebook in morality aspect in society.And the writer advise that the next writer will write about literary critism in different point of view.

References

Abrams, M.H. 1981. “A Glossary Literary Terms”. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2008. “Metodologi Penelitian Sastra: Epistemologi, Model, Teori, dan Aplikasi.”Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo

Hawthorne,N.1959.”The Young Good Man”. A Novel. The New American Library, New York and Toronto

Hawthorn, Jeremy. 1989. “Studying the Novel: An Introduction”. New York: Routledge, Chapman, andHall

Hornby, A.S. 1995. “Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English”. Great OxfordUniversity Press

Kenney, William. 1966. “How to Analyze Fiction”. New York: Monarch Press

Kholil, Masrukhin. 2007. “An Analysis on the Internal Conficts Faced by Main Characters of Nathaniel”

Koten, Thomas. Hukum dan Moral, Sebuah Seruan Etis. Accesed on 10 January 2013fromhttp://www.suarapembaruan. com/News/2001/10/20/Editor/ed05.htm l

Miller, J Hillis.2005.”Literature as Conduct”.Speech Act in Henry James. New York: Fordham University Press

Myyry, Liisa.2003.”Components Morality”. of A Professional ethics: perspective on Moral motivation, moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, and related construct among University students .A Dissertation.Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki.

Swales, John M & Christine B.Feak.1994.”Academic Writing for Graduate Students”.Essential Task and Skills. Michigan: University of Michigan Press

Downloads

Published

30.04.2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Portrait of Moralities In The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawtorne. (2024). Sanskriti: Journal of Humanities, 1(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.70680/rcpdgk37